Query China's case law and get back machine-readable records — court, cause of action, holding, awarded amount, outcome — with a citation back to the original judgment. The demo below runs live against a labor-dispute beta slice. The full corpus covers 160M+ publicly available PRC judgments.
Type a Chinese keyword or pick an example, then narrow with the structured filters below — the same fields the REST API and MCP server accept. Each result is a parsed record your AI product can consume directly, not raw HTML. Demo slice: labor & employment disputes.
Aggregated, anonymised statistics — zero personal data — computed across the labor-dispute slice. The kind of empirical benchmark litigation funders, insurers and in-house teams pay for. Click a column header to sort.
The same data behind this page is available as a REST API and a Model Context Protocol server — so Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or your in-house assistant can query Chinese case law natively. This is the layer the incumbent Chinese databases don't expose to AI vendors.
curl -X POST https://api.sinoverdict.com/v1/cases/search \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"q":"违法解除","pageSize":10}'
{
"mcpServers": {
"sinoverdict": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y","@sinoverdict/mcp"],
"env": { "SINOVERDICT_API_KEY": "YOUR_KEY" }
}
}
}
province, term_reason, years_min/years_max, year_from/year_to and page are the real filters, and the snippet rewrites itself to match whatever you selected in Module 1. Unrecognised parameter names are rejected with HTTP 400 rather than ignored. Trial keys for the live API/MCP are issued per evaluation — request one below.This demo runs on a labor-dispute beta slice. Commercial, IP, maritime and other foreign-relevant case types are available for paid evaluation — delivered as bulk dataset, REST API or MCP, with a compliance pack for your procurement team.
Request evaluation access →SinoVerdict licenses processed, structured derivatives of publicly available PRC court judgments. Data is sourced from public judicial disclosures; sensitive case categories are excluded. Informational only; not legal advice.